They Were Simply Digging a Drainage Ditch—Then They Stumbled Upon a 1,300-Year-Old Gold Treasure 29%

By Tim Newcomb20%

7/18/2026, 1:22:50 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Representativeness Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 34.8% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 823 faulty-reasoning hits from 448 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.5% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,549 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.00% of the article peer group.

Digging a drainage system is rarely an exciting process. 
But ‘rarely’ doesn’t mean ‘never,’ as was recently proven in Thailand when crews discovered a trove of gold treasures under the a famous reclining Buddha statue, located inside the Wat Thammachak Sema Ram temple complex. 
While digging over four feet below the sandstone statue, crews ran into a ceramic container. 
Inside that container were 33 ancient ornaments of gold, silver, and bronze, according to a translated statement from Thailand’s Fine Arts Department. 
The items included gold rings, silver earrings, and a pair of special bronze hoop earrings in the same style as others from the Dvaravati period (about 1,300 years ago) that have been found across the country. 
With one box of treasure found, crews were quick to search for more while continuing their conservation work at the Phra Non archaeological site. 
Digging around what is considered the country’s longest (the sculpture is 43 feet long) and oldest (created around 657 A.D.) reclining Buddha statue, they made three additional finds, which included hammered metal sheets covered in intricate artistry that had been created with a technique known as repoussé. 
One such discovery—a rectangular sheet of gold about three inches by five inches in size—depicts a seated Buddha in the pose of a teacher. 
The figure is shown with spiral curls, a large halo, elongated earlobes, and a robe over one of his shoulders. 
A small hole in the top right corner of the artwork means that it was likely hung with string, and could have either been worn or used as decoration, said Phanombutr Chantrachot, the director-general of the Fine Arts Department. 
Another repoussé sheet (this one made of a lead-tin alloy) also featured a representation of a Buddha, this time standing in an arched frame. 
This piece, which is about 4.5 inches by 6 inches, also depicts two attendants next to the Buddha figure. 
The left attendant was no longer discernible because of damage, but the attendant on the right might be the Thai expression of the Hindu god Brahma. 
The third piece is comprised of stacked metal sheets crammed inside packed clay, with cement between the metal. 
Due to damage, Chantrachot said, it was unclear exactly how many layers of metal were included. 
But while it was difficult to determine what was depicted on the metal, Chantrachot said that the location engraved behind the Buddha’s reclining head has lead experts to believe that the artwork was some sort of ritual offering purposely placed in the spot in which it was found. 
The Phimai National Museum is now conserving and cataloging the golden finds. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.5%Tim Newcomb: 5.7%Popular Mechanics: 4.4%Confirmation Bias18.5%This article: 10.5%Tim Newcomb: 0.7%Popular Mechanics: 1.1%Anchoring Bias10.5%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 3.1%Popular Mechanics: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 18.8%Tim Newcomb: 2.2%Popular Mechanics: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic18.8%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 1.5%Popular Mechanics: 1.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.7%Tim Newcomb: 4.2%Popular Mechanics: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias8.7%This article: 2.0%Tim Newcomb: 3.5%Popular Mechanics: 3.6%Framing Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.7%Popular Mechanics: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.5%Popular Mechanics: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.2%Tim Newcomb: 2.6%Popular Mechanics: 3.3%Optimism Bias11.2%This article: 2.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.9%Popular Mechanics: 1.1%Pessimism Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 4.2%Popular Mechanics: 5.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.5%Popular Mechanics: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Tim Newcomb: 1.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error3.6%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Tim Newcomb: 1.5%Popular Mechanics: 1.9%Halo Effect5.4%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.8%Tim Newcomb: 1.7%Popular Mechanics: 1.2%Recency Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.6%Popular Mechanics: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 34.8%Tim Newcomb: 5.7%Popular Mechanics: 5.5%Appeal to Authority34.8%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 1.6%Popular Mechanics: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 4.1%Popular Mechanics: 4.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 1.7%Popular Mechanics: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 10.7%Tim Newcomb: 0.6%Popular Mechanics: 0.8%Begging the Question10.7%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 3.1%Popular Mechanics: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.7%Tim Newcomb: 1.3%Popular Mechanics: 0.6%Burden of Proof8.7%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.3%Popular Mechanics: 0.5%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.5%Popular Mechanics: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.8%Tim Newcomb: 1.6%Popular Mechanics: 2.6%Anecdotal7.8%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 33.3%Tim Newcomb: 2.5%Popular Mechanics: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)33.3%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 1.2%Popular Mechanics: 1.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.9%Popular Mechanics: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 5.2%Popular Mechanics: 5.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.3%Popular Mechanics: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Newcomb: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

448 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers31%attributed speech311writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageThailand’s Fine Arts Department • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coveragePhanombutr Chantrachot • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageChantrachot • 16 words • 0.0% coverageChantrachot • 48 words • 0.0% coveragePhimai National Museum • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words28% of attributed speech72% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.