Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video59.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phaedra Waybourn results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Genetic Fallacy, Confirmation Bias, and Begging the Question, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 83.3% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 301.146 faulty-reasoning hits from 59.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,796 of 28,364 speakers). This Phaedra Waybourn is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Phaedra Waybourn
Speaker details
Total words: 59.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
70.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos59.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 83.3%83.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 83.3%83.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 70.8%70.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 41.7%41.7%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 16.7%16.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 83.3%, sitewide 5.2%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 83.3%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 70.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 15.9%Red Herring: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos