Speaker summary
⁠48%3 analyzed articles/videos184.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Shane results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Recency Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 55.3% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 398 faulty-reasoning hits from 184.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 19% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,690 of 28,203 speakers). This Peter Shane is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Peter Shane
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 184.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.2% percentile
19.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos184.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 55.3%55.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.7%25.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 55.3%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos