Speaker summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video93.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Runggaldier results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 107 faulty-reasoning hits from 93.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,630 of 28,364 speakers). This Peter Runggaldier is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Peter Runggaldier
Speaker details
Total words: 93.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.4% percentile
25.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos93.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 26.4%26.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.4%26.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos