Speaker summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video103.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter McLaughlin results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 226 faulty-reasoning hits from 103.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,566 of 28,364 speakers). This Peter McLaughlin is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Peter McLaughlin
Speaker details
Total words: 103.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
33.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos103.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos