Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video189.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pete Earle results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 58.8% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 863.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 189.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,810 of 28,364 speakers). This Pete Earle is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Pete Earle
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 189.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510037.2% percentile
23.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos189.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 58.8%58.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 44.4%44.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 45.4%45.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 40.3%40.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 35.9%35.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 21.5%21.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 58.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 45.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 44.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 40.3%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 35.9%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Composition/Division: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos