Speaker summary
â 84%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pete Docter results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Circular Reasoning, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 73.5% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 205.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 46.3% and a BS Rank of â 63% (10,662 of 28,364 speakers). This Pete Docter is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Pete Docter
Speaker details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
46.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0â100%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often