Speaker summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Penny Wong results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 50.363 hits. Analysis detected 172.784 faulty-reasoning hits from 168 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (24,270 of 28,364 speakers). This Penny Wong is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510014.4% percentile
11.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos168 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.9%20.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos