Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peggy Neely-Harris results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 140 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (3,335 of 28,364 speakers). This Peggy Neely-Harris is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Peggy Neely-Harris
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510088.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos