Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peg Minicozzi results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, False Dilemma, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 58.8% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 178.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 102 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,598 of 28,364 speakers). This Peg Minicozzi is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Peg Minicozzi
Speaker details
Total words: 102
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.4% percentile
21.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos102 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 58.8%58.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 58.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos