Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video44.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pedro Viloria results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 116 faulty-reasoning hits from 44.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 53.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,845 of 28,364 speakers). This Pedro Viloria is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Pedro Viloria
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠73%Pedro Viloria (selected)54%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 44.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
53.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos44.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 38.2%38.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos