Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pedro Sanchez results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 43.1% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 158 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (16,448 of 26,891 speakers). This Pedro Sanchez is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Pedro Sanchez
Speaker details
Total words: 62
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
24.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos62 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 28.5%28.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 43.1%43.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.5%28.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 43.1%, sitewide 15.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos