Speaker summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pedro Pascal results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Unattributed Quote, and Halo Effect, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 56.8% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 265 faulty-reasoning hits from 107 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,304 of 28,364 speakers). This Pedro Pascal is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Pedro Pascal
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 107
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.5% percentile
26.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos107 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 56.8%56.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 43.2%43.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 24.3%24.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 14.4%14.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 56.8%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 0.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos