Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video106.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pearl results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 142 hits. Analysis detected 355 faulty-reasoning hits from 106.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,776 of 28,364 speakers). This Pearl is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Pearl
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 106.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.1% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos106.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos