Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video115.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Felix results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 56.2% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 153 faulty-reasoning hits from 115.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,958 of 28,364 speakers). This Paul Felix is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Paul Felix
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 115.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.7% percentile
27.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos115.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 56.2%56.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 23.6%23.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 56.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing Effect: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos