Speaker summary
90%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Bobson results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Unattributed Quote, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (6,272 of 28,364 speakers). This Paul Bobson is worse (more manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
Paul Bobson
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.9% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos