Speaker summary
⁠53%2 analyzed articles/videos62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patti Smith results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 258 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 57.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,370 of 28,364 speakers). This Patti Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Patti Smith
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 62.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.0% percentile
57.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos62.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 87.2%87.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 37.2%37.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 37.2%37.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.5%25.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 87.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos