Speaker summary
53%1 analyzed article/video162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrizio Tressoldi results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 76.4% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 371.216 faulty-reasoning hits from 162 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.9% and a BS Rank of 44% (16,051 of 28,364 speakers). This Patrizio Tressoldi is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Patrizio Tressoldi
Speaker details
Total words: 162
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.4% percentile
26.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos162 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 76.4%76.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 26.6%26.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.2%13.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 76.4%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos