Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stav Dimitropoulos results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 1,161 hits . Analysis detected 8,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,440 of 6,321 authors). This Stav Dimitropoulos is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group. Stav Dimitropoulos
Author details
Total words: 11,196
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst