Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Moore results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Indoctrination, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 50.6% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 170 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (9,606 of 28,364 speakers). This Patrick Moore is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Patrick Moore
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠67%Patrick Moore (selected)50%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 70.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 49.4%49.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.6%50.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.6%50.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 49.4%49.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.6%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 49.4%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 49.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos