Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Eddington results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Slippery Slope, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 276.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (20,777 of 28,364 speakers). This Patrick Eddington is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Patrick Eddington
Speaker details
Total words: 140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510026.7% percentile
17.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos140 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.2%21.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.8%24.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos