Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meg Anderson results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 1,815 hits . Analysis detected 10,951 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,105 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,477 of 6,244 authors). This Meg Anderson is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group. Meg Anderson
Author details
Total words: 10,105
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst