Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Brown results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 69.5% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 511 faulty-reasoning hits from 174 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,867 of 27,881 speakers). This Patrick Brown is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Patrick Brown
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠44%Patrick Brown (selected)27%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 174
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.1% percentile
26.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos174 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 69.5%69.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 35.6%35.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 48.9%48.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 35.6%35.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 20.7%20.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 69.5%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 48.9%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 35.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 35.6%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos