Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video1,342.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patricia Summersett results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 233.456 hits. Analysis detected 1,859.72 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,342.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (28,046 of 28,364 speakers). This Patricia Summersett is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
Patricia Summersett
Speaker details
Total words: 1,342.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.1% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.2%4.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos