Speaker summary
⁠31%2 analyzed articles/videos1,523.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parry Gripp results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Overconfidence Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 1,168.296 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,523.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,318 of 28,364 speakers). This Parry Gripp is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
Parry Gripp
Speaker details
Total words: 1,523.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Composition/Division: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos