Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parker Esswein results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 84.8% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 602.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,967 of 28,364 speakers). This Parker Esswein is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Parker Esswein
Speaker details
Total words: 136
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
39.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos136 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 84.8%84.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 53.2%53.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 34.8%34.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 31.6%31.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 34.8%34.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 13.7%13.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 84.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 53.2%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 4.6%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos