Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wiliam Hunter results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,066 hits . Analysis detected 7,987 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,440 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,463 of 6,258 authors). This Wiliam Hunter is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group. Wiliam Hunter
Author details
Total words: 8,440
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.7% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.6% 12.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.0% 11.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst