Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Park results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Primacy Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 109 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,439 of 28,364 speakers). This Park is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Park
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠60%Park (selected)42%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 26
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.7% percentile
41.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos26 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 65.4%65.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 65.4%65.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 65.4%65.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 34.6%34.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 15.4%15.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 19.2%19.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 65.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 65.4%, sitewide 19.2%Primacy Effect: Speaker 65.4%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 34.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 26.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 6.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos