Speaker summary
40% 3 analyzed articles/videos 678.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pamela Smith results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 135 hits . Analysis detected 732.984 faulty-reasoning hits from 678.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,388 of 28,364 speakers). This Pamela Smith is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group. Pamela Smith
Speaker details
Total words: 678.5
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.4% percentile 5.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos678.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst