Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pamela Herd results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Pessimism Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 73.5% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 137.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,083 of 27,834 speakers). This Pamela Herd is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Pamela Herd
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.0% percentile
34.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 73.5%73.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 36.8%36.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.2%13.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 73.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos