Speaker summary
⁠36%2 analyzed articles/videos50 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pacifica City Council results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 48.5% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 128 faulty-reasoning hits from 50 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 48.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,322 of 28,364 speakers). This Pacifica City Council is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Pacifica City Council
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510063.6% percentile
48.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos50 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 48.5%48.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 48.5%48.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 48.5%48.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 48.5%48.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos