Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oxford Internet Institute results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 224 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 84.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,988 of 28,364 speakers). This Oxford Internet Institute is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Oxford Internet Institute
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.4% percentile
84.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 69.7%69.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 69.7%69.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 69.7%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 69.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos