Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 84.3% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 476.324 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 74.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,640 of 28,364 speakers). This Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
Speaker details
Total words: 88
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.1% percentile
74.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos88 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 84.3%84.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 84.3%84.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 58.8%58.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 79.4%79.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 58.8%58.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 58.8%58.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 84.3%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 84.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 79.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 58.8%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 58.8%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 58.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos