Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Opta results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 83.9% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 114 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 61.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,905 of 28,364 speakers). This Opta is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Opta
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 62
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.7% percentile
61.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos62 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 83.9%83.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 41.9%41.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 83.9%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 41.9%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos