Speaker summary
⁠39%3 analyzed articles/videos87.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These OPEC+ results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 103 faulty-reasoning hits from 87.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 25.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,317 of 27,730 speakers). This OPEC+ is better (less manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
OPEC+
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 87.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.2% percentile
25.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos87.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.7%23.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos