Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video50 analyzed words
BS Summary: These OnePlus results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 252 faulty-reasoning hits from 50 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 72% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,740 of 28,364 speakers). This OnePlus is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
OnePlus
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 50
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.8% percentile
72.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos50 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 76.0%76.0%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 76.0%76.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 76.0%76.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 76.0%76.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 76.0%76.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 24.0%24.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 76.0%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 76.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 76.0%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 76.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 76.0%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos