Speaker summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video174.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Onapsis results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Status Quo Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 234 faulty-reasoning hits from 174.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (22,604 of 28,364 speakers). This Onapsis is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Onapsis
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 174.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

20% percentile
025507510020.3% percentile
14.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos174.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 20.7%20.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos