The Hacker News17%
SAP Patches CVSS 9.9 NetWeaver ABAP Flaw That Could Expose or Modify Data 19%
By Ravie Lakshmanan12%
7/14/2026, 6:17:00 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 95 hits. Analysis detected 727 faulty-reasoning hits from 467 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34% and a BS Rank of 19% (17,748 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the article peer group.
SAP has rolled out updates to address multiple vulnerabilities as part of its July 2026 security updates, including a critical flaw in SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP.
The vulnerability in question is CVE-2026-44747 (CVSS score: 9.9), an out-of-bounds write flaw that allows an authenticated attacker to leverage logical errors in memory management to cause a memory corruption that could lead to unauthorized data access, modification, or system unavailability.
"As a temporary workaround the note proposes to disable all ICF nodes with a specific property in transaction SICF," SAP security firm Onapsis said.
"Since the workaround will disable opening transactions in SAP GUI for HTML, it is not an option for all customers and it is strongly recommended to install the patching ABAP Kernel version."
Also addressed by SAP are two other critical vulnerabilities -
CVE-2026-27690 (CVSS score: 9.1) - An HTTP request/response smuggling flaw in SAP Approuter deployments in non-Cloud Foundry environments that allows an unauthenticated attacker to send a specially crafted HTTP request that leads to request-response desynchronization and results in the exposure of user responses and triggers denial-of-service (DoS) attacks.
CVE-2026-44761 (CVSS score: 9.1) - A use of default credentials flaw in SAP Commerce Cloud that could retain a sample OAuth 2.0 client with publicly documented sample credentials originating from a sample configuration provided in SAP Help Portal documentation.
"If left unchanged, an unauthenticated attacker could use these well-known credentials to obtain a valid access token and invoke certain APIs to read and modify data," according to a description of CVE-2026-44741 in the NIST National Vulnerability Database (NVD).
"Successful exploitation results in high impact on confidentiality and integrity, with no impact on availability."
Onapsis noted that the vulnerability stems from sample configuration scripts previously provided in the SAP Help Portal.
These scripts, originally meant for development and testing, configure OAuth 2.0 clients with hard-coded, well-known credentials.
"Older versions of the documentation did not explicitly warn customers against importing these default settings into production," it noted.
"An unauthenticated attacker can leverage these publicly available, default credentials to obtain a valid access token.
With this token, they can invoke specific APIs to read and alter system data.
Exploitation requires that the customer executed the sample script and retained the resulting OAuth 2.0 client in production without replacing the hard-coded secret."
It's worth noting that customers who removed the sample client or replaced the secret with a strong, unique value are not impacted by the bug.
Customers are recommended to audit their production environments for the presence of the affected sample OAuth 2.0 client.
If the client exists, it must be removed.
Although there is no evidence of the flaws being exploited in the wild, it's advised to apply the necessary updates for optimal protection.
Speakers
2speakers27%attributed speech340writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageOnapsis
73 attributed words57% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.