Topic summary
⁠12%3 analyzed articles/videos1,360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Application Security results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 540 hits. Analysis detected 4,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,860 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,402 of 15,941 topics). This Application Security is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
Application Security
Topic details
Total words: 6,860
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510015.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos