Topic summary
⁠34%5 analyzed articles/videos3,484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vulnerability Management results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,133 hits. Analysis detected 12,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,203 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (10,946 of 16,266 topics). This Vulnerability Management is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Vulnerability Management
Topic details
Total words: 13,203
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos