Speaker summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video187.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Omdia results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 270.94 faulty-reasoning hits from 187.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,623 of 28,364 speakers). This Omdia is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Omdia
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 187.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510016.7% percentile
12.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos187.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 12.4%12.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.4%18.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos