Speaker summary
⁠51%2 analyzed articles/videos212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Omar Shareef results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 37.7% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 345.307 faulty-reasoning hits from 212 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (17,776 of 26,780 speakers). This Omar Shareef is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Omar Shareef
Speaker details
Total words: 212
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.6% percentile
21.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos212 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 37.7%37.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 26.4%26.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.0%22.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Speaker 37.7%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos