Speaker summary
70% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Omar Mohammed results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 362.431 hits . Analysis detected 3,139.567 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,666 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,766 of 28,364 speakers). This Omar Mohammed is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group. Omar Mohammed
Speaker details
Total words: 1,666
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.1% percentile 4.6% BS Score6 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 17.1% 17.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 21.8% 21.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Tu Quoque: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst