Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video777.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Wilde results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 155.722 hits. Analysis detected 1,066.383 faulty-reasoning hits from 777.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,874 of 28,364 speakers). This Olivia Wilde is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Olivia Wilde
Speaker details
Total words: 777.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.7% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos777.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.1%13.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.3%2.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Composition/Division: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos