Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video81 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia O'Sullivan results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Bandwagon, and Confirmation Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 45.7% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 128 faulty-reasoning hits from 81 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,986 of 28,364 speakers). This Olivia O'Sullivan is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Olivia O'Sullivan
Speaker details
Total words: 81
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
39.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos81 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 45.7%45.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 45.7%45.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 45.7%45.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.0%21.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 45.7%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 45.7%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 45.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos