Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video30 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oleksandr Merezhko results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 90 faulty-reasoning hits from 30 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,532 of 28,364 speakers). This Oleksandr Merezhko is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Oleksandr Merezhko
Speaker details
Total words: 30
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.5% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos30 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos