Speaker summary
⁠67%3 analyzed articles/videos90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Office of Foreign Assets Control results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 53.3% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 240 faulty-reasoning hits from 90 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 53.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,870 of 28,364 speakers). This Office of Foreign Assets Control is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Office of Foreign Assets Control

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
53.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos90 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 53.3%53.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 53.3%53.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 53.3%53.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 53.3%53.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 53.3%53.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 53.3%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 53.3%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 53.3%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 53.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 53.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos