Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Notre Dame’s College Republicans chapter results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 168 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (9,548 of 28,364 speakers). This Notre Dame’s College Republicans chapter is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Notre Dame’s College Republicans chapter
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

66% percentile
025507510066.3% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos