Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 622 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Susan Del Percio results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Ad Hominem , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 706 hits . Analysis detected 3,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,637 of 6,316 authors). This Susan Del Percio is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Susan Del Percio
Author details
Total words: 2,488
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.1% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 28.4% 28.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.7% 7.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.0% 12.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 9.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.7%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst