Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video622 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Susan Del Percio results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 706 hits. Analysis detected 3,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,637 of 6,316 authors). This Susan Del Percio is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Susan Del Percio
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
75%Susan Del Percio (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,488
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510074.1% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 28.4%28.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.7%7.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 12.0%12.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Author 9.0%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Author 7.7%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos