Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video38.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noriatsu Tanji results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Biased Writer Voice, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 53.4% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 139 faulty-reasoning hits from 38.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,223 of 26,862 speakers). This Noriatsu Tanji is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Noriatsu Tanji
Speaker details
Total words: 38.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.1% percentile
56.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos38.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 87.1%87.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 53.5%53.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 46.5%46.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 46.5%46.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 46.5%46.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 87.1%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 53.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos